นักฟุตบอลถูกแบนจากการแสดงความคิดเห็นเกี่ยวกับคนข้ามเพศ เรียกร้องให้สมาคมฟุตบอล (FA) ขอโทษ เพื่อให้องค์กรรับผิดชอบต่อการตัดสินใจและสร้างความโปร่งใสในกระบวนการลงโทษ ซึ่งมีผลกระทบต่อชื่อเสียงและอาชีพของเขา
Cerys Vaughan, a teenage amateur footballer, was at the center of controversy after being banned by the Football Association (FA) due to comments made during a match questioning the gender of a transgender opponent. The incident occurred during a pre-season friendly in Lancashire, leading to significant scrutiny over the FA's gender eligibility policies for sports. Vaughan expressed concern about fairness and safety when she queried the referee about her opponent's status, prompting a complaint from the opposing team, which was handled by the football anti-discrimination body Kick It Out.
Initially, Vaughan faced a six-match ban, reduced with a suspended sentence, for "using abusive and/or insulting words" related to gender reassignment. However, she contested these charges, asserting she sought clarification of the rules rather than intending offense. This sparked support from women's rights activists, including a protest at Wembley, and brought the issue to parliamentary attention.
Vaughan's appeal, supported by Free Speech Union and criticized by former FA chairman Lord Triesman, led to the examination of the original hearing's fairness. An FA appeal board later found the initial hearing unfair, noting Vaughan's distress in recounting her side during the proceedings and acknowledged that procedural failures might have obstructed her testimony. Consequently, the original decision was quashed, and the case was eventually dropped after the complainant withdrew.
The FA's recent policy change, banning transgender women from women’s football from June, aligned with Vaughan's stance. She argues that inclusion of biological males compromises the fairness and safety of women's football, highlighting concerns about physiological advantages retained from male puberty.
Despite the resolution, Vaughan seeks an official apology from the FA, criticising the lengthy and unnecessary procedural ordeal she experienced. The FA's new policy has been divisive; it has been welcomed by those focusing on physiological fairness, yet criticized by those advocating for inclusivity of transgender athletes. Natalie Washington from Football v Transphobia argued that the new rules unfairly target a small, non-problematic group and effectively exclude transgender women from football. The controversy underscores broader societal debates on the intersection of gender identity and sports participation.